Foreplay starts long before anyone's clothes come off — so here's what I'm looking for in a play partner.
In my world, foreplay isn't just what you do between kissing and intercourse; it's also anticipation leading up to the moment you start sensually touching, and can be built up throughout a date, the week, or over the course of a relationship.
It's in your curiosity about the other person's reactions, your ability to read them, and your trust in their ability to read you.
Rather than any specific technique, I'm seeking attunement, responsiveness, and engagement — if someone's attuned to my body, they can easily learn what strokes and cadences I love.
That's what I value in a relationship, and here's how I start looking for that.
(This post is just the tip of the iceberg. As always, decide for yourself what you value most in a play partner. How might that show up in practice during a kink scene or in early dating? Or, if you're into romance novels, reverse-engineer the media that makes you swoon!)
1. I observe how they act when I slow the tension way down.
A great play partner for me notices and finds ways to keep the tension while adjusting or gently checking in.
What happens when I pull back from a kiss and pause? What if I'm so wound up I'm shaking?
Do they ask how I'm feeling? Do they build on the intensity by combining their questions with dirty talk? Do they follow suit and do something similar, just as slowly but intentionally, watching how my breathing changes?
Rather than any specific technique, I'm seeking attunement, responsiveness, and engagement — if someone's attuned to my body, they can easily learn what strokes and cadences I love.
2. I doubly observe how they respond when I say no or change my mind about something.
How someone responds to a partner's "no" is a big fucking deal, especially if they're incorporating kink and power exchange.
In the early stages, when clarifying expectations, seeing how they respond to a "red light" or "yellow light" in low-stakes situations gives me an idea of how they might handle a more emotionally involved scene.
When I tell them to stop, slow down, or try something else, do they:
- Treat the connection as an organically growing entity?
- Expect sexual encounters to follow a straight path?
- Talk about alternatives, from a place of curiosity?
- Deride my "no" with sneaky assumptions?
It's one thing to talk about "must-haves"s and "hard no"s — though I will get to that in a bit! It's another to experience how someone accommodates a partner's needs when they're vulnerable.
3. If we're talking about kinks, I ask them how that kink came to be (and more!)
…because that gives context to not just the actions that turn them on, but also:
- Why do they like it?
- Who is the character they're playing?
- How would they like to feel?
- What needs and intentions are being gratified?
I want a partner who's aware of or at least willing to self-reflect on the "who," the "why," and the "how" — at least as much as they contemplate the "what."
Book recommendation: The Dominance Playbook by Anton Fulmen
I love Anton Fulmen's take on "character-based" vs. "plot-based" BDSM in his Dominance Playbook for that:
- Would you rather torment with fear or pleasure? Are you a bully, a Casanova, a coach, a caregiver, a ruler?
- Do you want control over someone by training a hair-trigger-like orgasm response, cumming on command repeatedly?
- Would you pair that with sweet teasing and holding or objectifying slurs?
There's no one right answer, but certainly some answers would fit your dream dynamics better than others.
4. Cuddling in movie theaters and semi-public spaces with a skirt on!
How creative do they get with touch when nobody's clothes have come off? Movie dates can also be a time to debrief on values afterwards — tell them about a scene you love and see how they respond.
Observe: can they get spicy with limitations?
Do they assume that touch must escalate to "more"?
Article Recommendation: What Is the Bristle Response?
The expectation that physical affection leads to sex is one of the most common patterns that sex therapists see in their practices! Read more about the bristle response — why unspoken assumptions about touch can feel stressful, and what to do about it — in my guest post for The Pelvic People.
5. Invite them to spicy parties and art shows.
If you're near a big city, chances are, there's a BDSM munch or play party waiting for you and your partner (or potential partner).
Most attendees are more there to mingle than to play in public, but it can open the conversation to what your "yes"es, "no"s, and "maybe"s are when it comes to what you want to do together.
If you're not comfortable taking someone to a sex or kink party to see how they feel about sexuality, perhaps find an erotic art show nearby.
See what resonates with them — and how that resonates with what you want.
6. How do they feel about flavored lube and toys in the bedroom, and why?
It's a small thing that might tell you something about their expectations and their relationship to oral.
Some people assume that flavored lube is entirely useless because, in their minds:
- Lube "should" be for intercourse
- Oral sex "should" be before intercourse
- They don't even consider varying sex acts once intercourse starts
It's not a 100% direct correlation, but the "why" behind their attitude is worth considering.
- Do they expect linear progression from kissing to oral to intercourse?
- Do they like using lube for a wide range of sex acts? Do they like lube at all?
- Are they open to mixing it up, like going from intercourse to oral with other sensations?
- Can they at least consider why someone else might like something, even if they don't?
I’m not asking whether they personally like artificial flavors; I’m curious about how they conceptualize the flow and flexibility of sex.
7. Analyze a morally gray situation or character together.
This might be slightly controversial, but I think it's good that I read some of the "Am I the Asshole?" subreddit with a prospective partner.
Obviously, it can start some fights, but it's good to be on the same page or at least be able to arrive at an understanding.
If their stance stays rigidly dismissive or defensive, consider how that might play out in other situations. It's not necessarily about agreeing, but how they handle:
- Ambiguous information
- Who they think deserves empathy
- Where empathy is deserved
Observe whether they can:
- Hold tension without villainizing
- Update their view when given new information
- Contextualize behavior without excusing harm
- Validate internal experience, even if they wouldn't take the same action
Personally, I'm sensitive to dismissal of structural forces, anxiety, and nuance — because those forms of invalidation can show up later as dismissal of shifting consent, emotional states, and contextual vulnerability.
It's all the same muscle, and, in simpler terms, I don't want to engage in power exchange with someone who lacks the empathy for it.
Closing Thoughts
Since sex and kink take abundant trust, I think there's a lot of overlap between general relationship advice and kink advice — and you'll notice that if you read The Dominance Playbook.
However, when there's so much overlap among…
- Neurodivergent people
- Those in analytical STEM fields
- Queer people
- Kinksters
…it can take a special degree of clarity and explicit communication — minimizing unspoken expectations — to navigate the intensity and trust of sex and kink.
Further Reading Recommendations
Tongue-Tied by Stella Harris is great for geeks who want crystal-clear communication and negotiations. (Considering that the brain is a funny place, and it's risky to make assumptions about a partner's wants and needs, that should be everyone on this page… right?)
This book is so densely packed with playful prompts for discussing your likes, loves, and must-haves in the bedroom — I'd argue every kinkster would benefit from reading it. Not everyone needs to read every page cover-to-cover, but it's a must-have for the uninitiated and might reveal some blind spots even for the experienced.
(Plus, by the time you're well-versed in something, it might not be easy to explain to a new partner. Tongue-Tied by Stella Harris certainly helps.
If you want the quick 101-level version, I've written another guest post for The Pelvic People called "Reading Between the Sheets: Tuning into a Partner's Pleasure Cues." It's all about reading non-verbal signals that your partner's enjoying the sensations, and how to talk about sex before, during, and after play, so that next time can be even better.
I'll say it again: one of the most important sexual skills to me is being attuned to a partner's turn-ons.
Seduce my mind and you can have my body, find my soul and I’m yours forever.”
― M.D. Waters, Archetype
Discover more from Super Smash Cache
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Comments
4 comments on “7 Ways I Gauge Kinky Play Partners (From a Sex Toy Reviewer)”
I'm confused. What does liking (or not liking) flavored lube have to do with the order of sex acts?
Some people assume that flavored lube is useless because, in their minds, oral "should" be before intercourse, and they don't even consider varying the order.
I hate all artificial flavorings, so I've never used flavored lube and it didn't occur to me it would be used for PIV. I assumed people… uh… put it on for the purpose of licking it off? Never really thought that through!
I understand using flavored condoms because latex doesn't taste good. But why would you want to taste fake fruit flavors when you could taste delicious real human flavors? And wouldn't those additives irritate the vagina? I always thought that whatever you put in there should be as plain as possible.
Anyway, don't assume someone who dislikes flavored lube also dislikes oral after intercourse. Maybe they like the taste of come way too much to cover it up!
I didn't assume; I said it might hint at that, which is very different, and I explained why. And sure, I wasn't super clear, so I edited it to make it clear that it's more about the "why" and added other considerations. Also, some flavorings are fine and some aren't.